BTC Community's view of BTG vs BCH & BSV?
Hi guys,
First I should note: I've been interested in bitcoin for quite some time, but I am by no means a professional.
So, I was looking into the history of the forks, & I can see the design problems with BCH & BSV - e.g. centralization - & also the problems with how the fork was done & the attempt to usurp the moniker of "bitcoin" in a disingenuous way. Also, the sycophancy of BCH & BSV towards Roger Ver & CSW respectively is obnoxious.
However, how did BTC respond to BTG (both in terms of its design changes & its split)? I feel like the desire to stave off centralization is a praiseworthy goal (though, I don't know if changing the PoW Algorithm as they did is the way to do that). Also, they don't seem to have the kind of vitriolic sycophancy from the other camps. I know there was a 51% attack on BTG, but I thought that was due to the network size rather than anything to do with design, right?
Anyways, I am just curious what the community thinks.
[link] [comments]
from Bitcoin - The Currency of the Internet http://bit.ly/2GmGJW3
No comments