Today Live Updates

Bitcoin

Can AI actually make Bitcoin mining more efficient? QBT’s research, explained

September 30, 2026 0
Can AI actually make Bitcoin mining more efficient? QBT’s research, explained

Bitcoin mining is not solved by “being smarter” at the math. ASICs repeatedly run SHA-256, changing inputs until they find a valid hash. The process requires enormous computing power and electricity.

Quantum Blockchain Technologies, or QBT, is researching ways to improve mining efficiency without replacing the ASIC hardware itself.

The main ideas include:

  • UltraBoost: reusing repeated calculations instead of starting from scratch each time.
  • Methods A and B: using data-driven search strategies to explore the hash space differently.
  • Method C, or the AI Oracle: attempting to identify calculations that may be unlikely to produce a useful result.

The concept is interesting: less brute force, more selective computation.

However, there is a major caveat. Some of the larger performance claims come from company-reported laboratory tests at lower difficulty levels. That is not the same as independent, long-term proof on Bitcoin’s live network.

Also, this probably will not make Bitcoin cheaper or easier for ordinary users. Difficulty adjusts every 2,016 blocks, and wallet security, fees and confirmation rules remain the same.

The ASIC may get an AI assistant. It still has to pass the real-world exam.

What do you think: genuine mining innovation, or a claim that still needs much more evidence? Learn more at: https://coin.space/how-to-mine-btc-with-ai-qbt-technology/

Educational discussion only. Not financial advice.

submitted by /u/skyjam-music
[link] [comments]


from Bitcoin - The Currency of the Internet https://ift.tt/zUykMCI

Your self-hosted Bitcoin node may be keeping more information than you think

September 29, 2026 0

Running your own Bitcoin infrastructure is supposed to reduce the number of people and systems you have to trust.

But there's a part of the threat model that's easy to forget: logs.

I started looking into this after a recent Core Lightning change involving I/O logs that could contain runes and other sensitive information.

What interested me wasn't just the CLN fix. It was what happens after something sensitive reaches a log.

It may end up in journald. Docker. Plugin output. Reverse proxy logs. Monitoring. Backups. Old snapshots. Even shell history.

So I audited the whole path on a self-hosted setup rather than looking only at lightningd.

I wrote up the process here:

https://davidebtc186.substack.com/p/your-lightning-node-may-be-logging

I'm not suggesting disabling logs. They're incredibly useful when you're operating your own infrastructure.

The goal is knowing what you're retaining, where it goes, who can read it, and when it disappears.

The question I ended up using for my own threat model was:

If someone got a copy of every log on my Bitcoin server today, what would I need to consider compromised?

Curious how other self-hosters here handle log retention — especially people running Bitcoin Core + Lightning + monitoring on the same machine.

submitted by /u/Large-Cress900
[link] [comments]

from Bitcoin - The Currency of the Internet https://ift.tt/mlxjyN0
Theme images by Jason Morrow. Powered by Blogger.